If your view of the justice system comes from dramatizations, you’d be forgiven if you expect most murder cases to go to trial. Isn’t that what’s portrayed? Witnesses holding back tears. A defiant defendant. A horrified and split jury. Then comes the surprise evidence. Finally… the verdict that delivers justice and normalcy returns.
In Hollywood, maybe…
The reality is quite different. In the United States, the vast majority of murder charges—like most criminal cases—never make it to trial. Instead, they are almost always resolved through plea bargains.

This can come as a shock to families of murder victims. After experiencing the unimaginable trauma of losing a loved one to homicide, many hold onto the idea of a trial as the moment when truth is revealed, accountability is ensured, and some semblance of justice is delivered. But for reasons both strategic and systemic, prosecutors often choose to offer a plea deal—and accept one from the accused. Here’s why.
The Uncomfortable Math of a Trial
Trials are long. They are expensive. And they are unpredictable.
Even in cases where guilt seems obvious, prosecutors face many hurdles. There are evidentiary challenges, reluctant or traumatized witnesses, legal technicalities, jury dynamics, and more. Juries don’t always convict (remember O.J. Simpson’s surprise acquittal?). And when they don’t, a defendant walks free. In a system where each courtroom is overburdened with a backlog of cases, securing a plea deal—where a defendant agrees to plead guilty to a lesser charge or in exchange for a specific sentence—can feel like the safest path to some accountability.

Sometimes, a plea guarantees a long prison sentence that prosecutors might struggle to secure in trial. A plea deal virtually guarantees a conviction (unlike a jury trial). In addition, there is usually no appeal. We don’t have to sit through grueling, retraumatizing testimony. There is no cross-examination of a grieving relative or friend, and no waiting two or more years for the case to come to trial.
But for Families, Plea Deals Can Feel Like Betrayal
For many families, the idea of a plea deal feels like a shortcut—or worse, a betrayal. It seems as though the person who ended their loved one’s life is being offered a discount on justice. They may hear “second-degree murder” or “manslaughter” and wonder: Was my loved one’s life worth less than a full trial? Does this plea reflect the full truth of what happened?
And there’s another toll, one that’s often overlooked: families are left with unanswered questions. Because plea deals bypass the trial process, the evidence is never laid out in open court. There is no public recounting of what happened, no opportunity to hear witness testimony or understand the sequence of events, no chance to piece together the final moments of their loved one’s life. Families are left with a haunting silence where answers should be—and the justice system offers little closure in that void.

What’s often missing from public discussion is the emotional toll these decisions take on surviving families. The legal system, bound by efficiency and risk management, doesn’t always make space for the emotional reality of losing someone to violence. Grieving relatives are asked to accept decisions made in back rooms by professionals balancing legal odds. The system is opaque, not transparent. Even when prosecutors do their best to explain, the pain of compromise and the absence of truth-telling linger indefinately.
A System Under Strain
It’s important to understand that this isn’t always about lack of care—it’s often about the system itself. Many prosecutors carry heavy caseloads and work within tight budgets. Trials require resources that many jurisdictions simply don’t have. In some cases, key evidence may be missing or inadmissible, and the risk of going to trial is too great. Accepting a plea deal doesn’t mean the prosecutor doesn’t care—it may mean they’re doing the best they can with the hand they’ve been dealt.
But that doesn’t mean families don’t deserve more transparency, more empathy, and more voice in the process.
What Needs to Change?
We can—and should—expect a justice system that serves the people it’s meant to protect. That includes:
- Better communication with victims’ families, so they understand why a plea is being offered and what it means.
- Victim impact involvement, even in plea deals, so families have a chance to speak and be heard.
- Policy reform, so prosecutors have the resources and support to go to trial when it matters most.
- Cultural change, so we stop glorifying trials while ignoring the compromises made behind closed doors.
- Access to case information, so families aren’t left in the dark simply because the legal path chosen was quicker.

Justice, after all, is not just about punishment. It’s about truth, accountability, and healing.
If You’re a Family Member Living This Reality
If you’ve lost someone to homicide and the case ended in a plea deal, your grief is valid. Your pain is real. And your questions deserve answers. A plea bargain does not reduce the value of your loved one’s life. It’s natural to feel confused, angry, disappointed—or relieved. You don’t have to feel just one thing.
You are not alone. And justice, while sometimes imperfect in the courtroom, can still live on in how we honor those we’ve lost, how we support one another, and how we work to make the system better for those who come after us.

