Spoler Alert: There Is No Hollywood Ending

One of the questions homicide survivors are asked — sometimes gently, sometimes insistently or implied — is this:

“Have you forgiven them?” “Have you ever spoken to them?” “Have you reached out?”

The question usually comes with good intentions. It’s offered as a path to healing, closure, or peace.

But beneath it sits an unspoken assumption: that healing requires contact, reconciliation, or a redemptive arc; some connection to the guilty party who brought devastation to their doorstep.

That assumption is wrong — and for survivors, it is harmful.

white concrete building on top of mountain during sunset

The Hollywood Script We’ve All Absorbed

We live in a culture steeped in cinematic resolution. In films and television, trauma follows a familiar trajectory:

  • confrontation
  • confession
  • apology
  • forgiveness
  • emotional release

The story resolves. The audience exhales. Order is restored. The viewer feels reassured.

But homicide is not a screenplay.

There is no final conversation that brings someone back.
There is no apology that repairs the loss.
There is no exchange that equalizes the damage.

When society expects survivors to produce a Hollywood ending, it isn’t asking what they need. It’s asking for emotional relief — for itself.

a woman hugging another woman in a crowd

The Subtle Pressure Placed on Survivors

Survivors often feel an unspoken demand to demonstrate that they are “healing properly.”

That pressure can show up as encouragement to:

  • forgive publicly
  • pursue reconciliation
  • engage in restorative dialogue
  • speak generously about the offender
  • show transcendence rather than boundary

Those who do not comply are often quietly judged as:

  • bitter
  • stuck
  • angry
  • unwilling to move on

This creates a second burden — layered on top of grief and trauma.

Survivors are asked not only to endure loss, but to manage other people’s discomfort with that loss.

And yet, we don’t ask a homeowner, “So… have you and the burglar made up?”

The question would sound absurd — even offensive.
But when the loss is homicide, we somehow expect the injured party to supply reconciliation on demand.

Forgiveness, Contact, and Closure Are Not the Same Thing

This distinction matters:

  • Forgiveness is internal.
  • Contact is relational.
  • Closure is personal and nonlinear.

They are not interchangeable, and none are mandatory.

Some survivors may choose to engage with offenders. Others may not. Neither choice defines moral worth, strength, or recovery. And neither choice must be explained or justified.

Healing can occur without:

  • conversation
  • explanation
  • reconciliation
  • proximity

For many survivors, distance is not avoidance — it is psychological first aid.

A Brief Word to Clinicians and Advocates

For those who work professionally with homicide survivors, it is worth examining how cultural expectations can quietly leak into clinical work — through the questions we ask, the goals we imply, or the assumptions we make about what “resolution” should look like. When forgiveness, reconciliation, or contact are framed as therapeutic milestones — even subtly — survivors may experience pressure to conform to a narrative that does not fit their reality. Healing is not measured by willingness to engage with an offender. It is measured by restored functioning, stabilized nervous systems, reclaimed agency, and the ability to live forward with integrity. Respecting a survivor’s decision to maintain permanent boundaries is not avoidance; it is often evidence of psychological clarity.

Who the Hollywood Ending Really Serves

The desire for reconciliation often serves:

  • observers who want reassurance
  • institutions that prefer tidy narratives
  • media that seek emotional payoff

It does not necessarily serve the survivor.

When we ask survivors to participate in redemption arcs, we risk recentralizing the person who caused the harm — granting them continued relevance, attention, and emotional gravity in a life they already shattered.

For some survivors, that is not healing. It is re-injury.

What Strength Actually Looks Like

Real strength after homicide may look like:

  • permanent boundaries
  • refusing spectacle
  • declining contact
  • choosing proportional justice
  • living forward without explanation

It may look quiet.
It may look unsatisfying to outsiders.
It may lack cinematic resolution.

Spoiler alert: there is no Hollywood ending.

And that is not a failure of healing.
It is an honest reflection of reality.

If we truly want to support homicide survivors, we must stop asking them to make their stories more comfortable for us — and start respecting the many valid ways people survive what cannot be fixed.

For more detailed information and for other resources, please refer to my book What Now? Navigating the Aftermath of Homicide and Suicide, available now on Amazon.

Click this Amazon link:   https://www.amazon.com/What-Now-Navigating-Aftermath-Homicide-ebook/dp/B0BXND9DQR

I’m Jan Canty. Psychologist, author, podcast host, speaker…  and homicide survivor.

I am passionate about finding ways to support and help other so-called “homicide or suicide survivors.”

No one should have to go through this kind of loss… but if you do, I want you to know… YOU ARE NOT ALONE! 

You aren’t crazy. It’s not your imagination! Society does not know how to comfort us. Fortunately, we know how to comfort one another.

Check out my books and get tools and resources to help you or someone you love!

The Aftermath Conference

SAVE THE DATE for the National Homicide Survivor Conference. (More details coming soon!)

September 11th - 13th, 2026
Gig Harbor, Washington

Registration will open 9-11-25 and is limited to 75 people.

If you would like to register or get more information please contact us via email: aftermath.of.homicide@gmail.com